Articles Posted in Chapter 13 Bankruptcy

Published on:

To cram down property owned jointly, both spouses have to file a Chapter 13 bankruptcy. The Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of Florida held recently that a Chapter 13 debtor whose spouse does not join in the debtor’s bankruptcy petition is not permitted to cram down a claim secured by a lien on property owned by the debtor as a tenant by the entireties. If the debtor were allowed to cram down the claim, the court reasoned, his nonfiling wife would be granted the benefit of having filed for bankruptcy without having to carry any of the burdens, and the Code does not permit this. In re Alvarez, 2012 WL 1425097 (Bankr. S.D. Fla., April 24, 2012).

Another approach is that the non-filing spouse could quit claim their interest in the property to the debtor. That way when the debtor files the bankruptcy, he or she is the sole owner of the property. We have found this works just as well.

Transfers of property especially shortly before filing a bankruptcy is a complex matter and should only be done after consultation with a qualified bankruptcy attorney. For a free consultation, please consider Arkovich Law

Published on:

Many people think it is advantageous to only list certain creditors in their bankruptcy. This is not permissible in a bankruptcy because all creditors must be listed. You cannot favor one creditor over another. However, you can always voluntarily pay a creditor back after a bankruptcy if you wish.

Besides the creditors have their own subscription system with a third party that monitors PACER filings where they will generally learn of a client’s bankruptcy filing even if not listed. Moreover, if the bankruptcy is an asset case, by not listing the creditor, you’ve actually cheated them of monies they would have received in the bankruptcy.

You only become legally obligated to repay a creditor after filing a Chapter 7 bankruptcy if you sign and file a Reaffirmation Agreement with that creditor. A Reaffirmation Agreement reaffirms the debt and sometimes can be advantageous to the debtor if he wants to retain an asset but can’t pay for it outright and in full.

Published on:

ch 7.jpgMany more bankrupt debtors will be able to keep their house in a Chapter 7 now!

In a surprising decision by a court of appeals not noted for its sympathy for debtors’ positions, the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals, held in a unanimous decision that a Chapter 7 debtor may strip off a second mortgage. Prior to this O’Neal decision on May 11, 2012, debtors could only do this in a Chapter 13 case. The Eleventh Circuit is the federal appellate court for the Middle District of Florida which includes the Tampabay area.

Twenty-three years earlier, the Court of Appeals had reached this conclusion in Matter of Folendore, 862 F.2d 1537 (11th Cir. 1989), and the present court reasoned that the decision in Folendore survived the Supreme Court’s decision in Dewsnup v. Timm, 502 U.S. 410, 112 S.Ct. 773, 116 L.Ed.2d 903 (1992), which held that a Chapter 7 debtor may not cram down an undersecured claim to the value of the collateral. Here, the Court of Appeals reasoned, the creditor’s junior mortgage lien was both allowed under Code § 502 and wholly unsecured under § 506(a), and the lien was therefore voidable under the plain language of § 506(d). In re McNeal, Case No. 11-11352 (11th Cir., May 11, 2012).

Published on:

mousetrap.jpgOur Tampa, Florida bankruptcy law firm is small enough that we are able to help time our clients’ bankruptcy case for maximum results. Without proper timing, a bankruptcy can feel more like a trap than a remedy for financial ills. We are often able to save our clients several hundred dollars a month by simply correctly timing their case. A high volume mill firm won’t do this, their business model is based upon touching their clients’ files a minimum number of times and getting it filed asap.

However, the timing can be critical. Both in terms of assets that our clients can keep and the type of case or relief they qualify for. Most of our clients have something to lose. Our goal is to help ensure they come out ahead when their bankruptcy is filed.

Simple things to keep in mind. It is not wise to file a bankruptcy if you anticipate large expenses in the future, such as an upcoming surgery where there could be uninsured medical costs. It will be another 8 years before you can file Chapter 7 again so choose your timing wisely.

Published on:

chained to house.jpgMany bankruptcy debtors in Florida are understandably confused when they surrender their home in the bankruptcy, but are still receiving various dunning letters.

First, it is important to understand that the Bankruptcy Code does not have a mechanism in place to provide for the actual transfer of the real estate to the mortgage company, at least not in a lien theory state like Florida. So in order for the home ownership to transfer legally to the mortgage company, one of three things must occur; 1) a foreclosure sale; 2) a short sale; 3) a deed in lieu is signed by the debtor and accepted by the mortgage company; or 4) a quit claim to another party which is recorded.

So a homeowner may still receive letters and remain liable for certain things even after a bankruptcy is filed:

Published on:

1099c.jpgCreditors are busily sending out more 1099C’s then ever before according to a story by Jeremy Campbell of Channel 13 in Tampa, Florida this week. The news story “How the IRS taxes debt” explains that debt settlements while good, come with a penalty. Consumers are taxed on the forgiven debt sometimes months or years after the settlement. More than 6 million consumers are expected to receive 1099C’s this year, double last year.

One important point that the story did not address. Cancelled debt is not taxed in a bankruptcy. Just saying.

Published on:

pros_cons.gifI often sit with my clients in Tampa, Florida and perform a simple test: I make two columns on a piece of paper and list the pros and cons of filing bankruptcy versus trying to settle their debt.

More often than not, the bankruptcy column has many more pros, while the debt settlement column has more cons. For instance, in a Chapter 13, the monthly payment is usually much less. In a Chapter 7, the monthly payment is zero if there is no disposable income.

Debt settlement on the other hand usually requires the client have lump sum amounts available to offer to get any kind of substantial reduction. So they have to save up. The client has to reach satisfactory agreements with each creditor, or they still have leftover debt. Finally, in debt settlements the cancelled debt is taxable by the IRS. Not so in bankruptcy.

Published on:

nacba.jpgThe Federal Housing Finance Agency (FHFA) that recently approved of HAMP principal reduction for Freddie and Fannie loans has rejected a proposal by the National Association of Consumer Bankruptcy Attorneys (NACBA). The Principal Paydown Plan is designed to amend the bankruptcy code to allow for payments during a Chapter 13 to go towards principal to substantially reduce the balance owed on an underwater home.

According to an email update by NACBA, many members of Congress have endorsed the Principal Payback Plan. However, despite FHFA Director DeMarco’s initial positive comments about the Principal Paydown Plan, which he said struck him as “being responsible,” and a “credible way to address the crisis while recognizing various interests mortgaged properties,” he recently wrote to Congress informing them that the agency would not be implementing the Principal Paydown Plan. FHFA concluded that few GSE borrowers have filed for chapter 13 bankruptcy and are underwater and therefore the proposal would not be all that helpful. They did, however, commit to doing what they can to help eligible borrowers in bankruptcy get the HAMP modifications they qualify for.

Personally, I see a lot of homeowners that would qualify for the Principal Paydown Plan. Moreover, until something is done about the conflict of interest of servicers, we are not going to see any widespread adoption of principal reduction for Fannie and Freddie loans.

Published on:

price v value.jpgQuotation of the Day:

“The fundamental issue is that law schools are producing people who are not capable of being counselors. They are lawyers in the sense that they have law degrees, but they aren’t ready to be a provider of services.” Jeffrey W. Carr, General Counsel.

At my Tampa, Florida law firm we pride ourselves in our abilities to counsel clients as to their options and help make decisions that may impact the rest of their lives. We don’t take that responsibility lightly. We don’t just file bankruptcy for everyone who contacts us. It is not one size fits all. We don’t mandate that our bankruptcy clients file according to our schedule when simple timing and planning achieves a much better result. We don’t suggest every client defend their foreclosure or maintain a scorched earth policy. We are able to advise our clients regarding both bankruptcy and foreclosure or civil defense. I have 20 years legal experience in areas of bankruptcy and civil litigation (including foreclosure defense).

Published on:

If you are like most Florida consumers overloaded with debt, by not considering bankruptcy, you are continuing to just throw money away on debt servicing. Once you get behind, it can be nearly impossible to catch up especially now with the costs of living rising higher than wage increases. You have options rather than see your money continue to go down the drain: speak with a bankruptcy attorney. Quit delaying. Make a decision now. Bankruptcy may or may not be the answer. But you owe it to your family and yourself to find out if it is.

debt whirlpool.jpgNationwide bankruptcies by consumers declined approximately 10% last year. Is this a sign the economy is improving? In part perhaps. But mostly, it may be from indecision, and the inability to pay up to $2,000 to file bankruptcy. The debt is still there and getting bigger in most cases.

The general need for bankruptcy is still present, but the financial ability of clients to pay the fees has decreased. The availability for credit is diminished. In the past, as long as you were breathing, you were able to secure a car loan and probably even a home loan. Not anymore. Costs of food and other essentials have skyrocketed leaving less disposable income. The availability of funds to pay one-time fees for a bankruptcy attorney or other unexpected expenses is non-existent for some clients.

Contact Information