Articles Posted in Chapter 13 Bankruptcy

Published on:

ch 7.jpgMany more bankrupt debtors will be able to keep their house in a Chapter 7 now!

In a surprising decision by a court of appeals not noted for its sympathy for debtors’ positions, the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals, held in a unanimous decision that a Chapter 7 debtor may strip off a second mortgage. Prior to this O’Neal decision on May 11, 2012, debtors could only do this in a Chapter 13 case. The Eleventh Circuit is the federal appellate court for the Middle District of Florida which includes the Tampabay area.

Twenty-three years earlier, the Court of Appeals had reached this conclusion in Matter of Folendore, 862 F.2d 1537 (11th Cir. 1989), and the present court reasoned that the decision in Folendore survived the Supreme Court’s decision in Dewsnup v. Timm, 502 U.S. 410, 112 S.Ct. 773, 116 L.Ed.2d 903 (1992), which held that a Chapter 7 debtor may not cram down an undersecured claim to the value of the collateral. Here, the Court of Appeals reasoned, the creditor’s junior mortgage lien was both allowed under Code § 502 and wholly unsecured under § 506(a), and the lien was therefore voidable under the plain language of § 506(d). In re McNeal, Case No. 11-11352 (11th Cir., May 11, 2012).

Published on:

mousetrap.jpgOur Tampa, Florida bankruptcy law firm is small enough that we are able to help time our clients’ bankruptcy case for maximum results. Without proper timing, a bankruptcy can feel more like a trap than a remedy for financial ills. We are often able to save our clients several hundred dollars a month by simply correctly timing their case. A high volume mill firm won’t do this, their business model is based upon touching their clients’ files a minimum number of times and getting it filed asap.

However, the timing can be critical. Both in terms of assets that our clients can keep and the type of case or relief they qualify for. Most of our clients have something to lose. Our goal is to help ensure they come out ahead when their bankruptcy is filed.

Simple things to keep in mind. It is not wise to file a bankruptcy if you anticipate large expenses in the future, such as an upcoming surgery where there could be uninsured medical costs. It will be another 8 years before you can file Chapter 7 again so choose your timing wisely.

Published on:

chained to house.jpgMany bankruptcy debtors in Florida are understandably confused when they surrender their home in the bankruptcy, but are still receiving various dunning letters.

First, it is important to understand that the Bankruptcy Code does not have a mechanism in place to provide for the actual transfer of the real estate to the mortgage company, at least not in a lien theory state like Florida. So in order for the home ownership to transfer legally to the mortgage company, one of three things must occur; 1) a foreclosure sale; 2) a short sale; 3) a deed in lieu is signed by the debtor and accepted by the mortgage company; or 4) a quit claim to another party which is recorded.

So a homeowner may still receive letters and remain liable for certain things even after a bankruptcy is filed:

Published on:

1099c.jpgCreditors are busily sending out more 1099C’s then ever before according to a story by Jeremy Campbell of Channel 13 in Tampa, Florida this week. The news story “How the IRS taxes debt” explains that debt settlements while good, come with a penalty. Consumers are taxed on the forgiven debt sometimes months or years after the settlement. More than 6 million consumers are expected to receive 1099C’s this year, double last year.

One important point that the story did not address. Cancelled debt is not taxed in a bankruptcy. Just saying.

Published on:

pros_cons.gifI often sit with my clients in Tampa, Florida and perform a simple test: I make two columns on a piece of paper and list the pros and cons of filing bankruptcy versus trying to settle their debt.

More often than not, the bankruptcy column has many more pros, while the debt settlement column has more cons. For instance, in a Chapter 13, the monthly payment is usually much less. In a Chapter 7, the monthly payment is zero if there is no disposable income.

Debt settlement on the other hand usually requires the client have lump sum amounts available to offer to get any kind of substantial reduction. So they have to save up. The client has to reach satisfactory agreements with each creditor, or they still have leftover debt. Finally, in debt settlements the cancelled debt is taxable by the IRS. Not so in bankruptcy.

Published on:

nacba.jpgThe Federal Housing Finance Agency (FHFA) that recently approved of HAMP principal reduction for Freddie and Fannie loans has rejected a proposal by the National Association of Consumer Bankruptcy Attorneys (NACBA). The Principal Paydown Plan is designed to amend the bankruptcy code to allow for payments during a Chapter 13 to go towards principal to substantially reduce the balance owed on an underwater home.

According to an email update by NACBA, many members of Congress have endorsed the Principal Payback Plan. However, despite FHFA Director DeMarco’s initial positive comments about the Principal Paydown Plan, which he said struck him as “being responsible,” and a “credible way to address the crisis while recognizing various interests mortgaged properties,” he recently wrote to Congress informing them that the agency would not be implementing the Principal Paydown Plan. FHFA concluded that few GSE borrowers have filed for chapter 13 bankruptcy and are underwater and therefore the proposal would not be all that helpful. They did, however, commit to doing what they can to help eligible borrowers in bankruptcy get the HAMP modifications they qualify for.

Personally, I see a lot of homeowners that would qualify for the Principal Paydown Plan. Moreover, until something is done about the conflict of interest of servicers, we are not going to see any widespread adoption of principal reduction for Fannie and Freddie loans.

Published on:

price v value.jpgQuotation of the Day:

“The fundamental issue is that law schools are producing people who are not capable of being counselors. They are lawyers in the sense that they have law degrees, but they aren’t ready to be a provider of services.” Jeffrey W. Carr, General Counsel.

At my Tampa, Florida law firm we pride ourselves in our abilities to counsel clients as to their options and help make decisions that may impact the rest of their lives. We don’t take that responsibility lightly. We don’t just file bankruptcy for everyone who contacts us. It is not one size fits all. We don’t mandate that our bankruptcy clients file according to our schedule when simple timing and planning achieves a much better result. We don’t suggest every client defend their foreclosure or maintain a scorched earth policy. We are able to advise our clients regarding both bankruptcy and foreclosure or civil defense. I have 20 years legal experience in areas of bankruptcy and civil litigation (including foreclosure defense).

Published on:

If you are like most Florida consumers overloaded with debt, by not considering bankruptcy, you are continuing to just throw money away on debt servicing. Once you get behind, it can be nearly impossible to catch up especially now with the costs of living rising higher than wage increases. You have options rather than see your money continue to go down the drain: speak with a bankruptcy attorney. Quit delaying. Make a decision now. Bankruptcy may or may not be the answer. But you owe it to your family and yourself to find out if it is.

debt whirlpool.jpgNationwide bankruptcies by consumers declined approximately 10% last year. Is this a sign the economy is improving? In part perhaps. But mostly, it may be from indecision, and the inability to pay up to $2,000 to file bankruptcy. The debt is still there and getting bigger in most cases.

The general need for bankruptcy is still present, but the financial ability of clients to pay the fees has decreased. The availability for credit is diminished. In the past, as long as you were breathing, you were able to secure a car loan and probably even a home loan. Not anymore. Costs of food and other essentials have skyrocketed leaving less disposable income. The availability of funds to pay one-time fees for a bankruptcy attorney or other unexpected expenses is non-existent for some clients.

Published on:

student loan debt hat.jpgTonight at 10:00 p.m. the lead story on Channel 13 inTampa is about the National Association of Consumer Bankruptcy Attorneys’ survey that came out today warning of an emerging student loan debt bomb. News Reporter Jeremy Campbell interviewed me about this study and the future impact of student loan debt.

It is very difficult to discharge a student loan in bankruptcy. A debtor has to show an undue hardship that will likely persist for the majority of the repayment period (which runs from 10 to 25 years). They have to show they have minimized their expenses and maximized their income. They also have to prove they have made a good faith effort to repay. Partial discharges of debt are possible and often a favored result for both parties.

The NACBA study shows that four out of five bankruptcy attorneys say that potential clients with student loan debt have increased significantly or somewhat over the last three-four years. Approximately 95 percent determine that few student loan debtors have any chance of obtaining a discharge as a result of an undue hardship.

Published on:

hurdle2.jpgDue to the particularly bad housing market in Florida, more of our bankruptcy debtors are finding themselves exceeding the debt caps in a Chapter 13 when they have severely underwater homes. When this happens, a debtor becomes ineligible for Chapter 13 relief and is required to file a more expensive and cumbersome Chapter 11 in order to keep their home. Thus, those clients who most need the relief of a Chapter 13 reorganization plan, including stripping their second mortgage and having up to 60 months to catch up on their first mortgage, are denied the relief because they exceed the amount of debt allowed in a Chapter 13. Presently, the maximum amount of secured debt allowed is $1,081,400 and $360,475 for unsecured debt. It is the unsecured debt cap that becomes a problem with large underwater second mortgages, undersecured first mortgages, combined with credit card or medical debt.

This hurdle was likely not even considered by Congress when it established the debt caps in the first place. With the enactment of the Bankruptcy Code in 1978, Chapter 13s became much more widely used as sole proprietors became eligible for the first time. Prior to the 1978 revisions only wage earners qualified. While opening up Chapter 13 relief to any with regular income (including business owners and social security recipients), Congress saw the potential for abuse and established debt caps so that sole proprietors of large businesses could not evade the more stringent and creditor-friendly requirements of a Chapter 11.

So what was intended as an expansion of the scope of Chapter 13 eligibility has inadvertently turned out to be a hindrance. The courts and trustees have taken different views of eligibility, and until the U.S. Supreme Court or Congress weighs in, uncertainty will rule. Some courts consider it jurisdictional, some consider it discretionary, and the time periods for determining the total debt varies from when the case is filed to after the creditors bar date to see what debt remains after creditors file their proofs of claim and any objections are ruled upon.

Contact Information